Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 10:16:20 05/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 17, 2002 at 11:01:09, Russell Reagan wrote: >On May 16, 2002 at 20:34:49, Robert Henry Durrett wrote: > >>How to Improve Planning Ability of Engines? > >That's the question everyone would like to know the answer to, but no one (or at >least no one that's going to tell) knows. Perhaps those who are creating chess software for profit would not wish to give their competition any help. That would be understandable. But what about the rest of the people posting here? I would have expected to see MANY THREADS about this topic. After all, correcting the most important deficiency of current chess software should be the first thing on everybody's minds! All of the creative and free-thinking people here [i.e. everyone here]should be presenting new ideas for discussion. Where is that discussion????? > >>Will the new AMD and Intel 64-bit >>microprocessors make possible programming techniques not currently possible and >>thereby solve this problem? > >No, a 32-bit processor can do anything a 64-bit processor can do. Currently >32-bit processors probably do it faster too, even though it takes twice as many >instructions or more to accomplish the same thing. Eventually 64-bit computers >will be faster though. It will just mean faster chess programs, that's all. I guess that's what they said about 32-bit when everybody was using 16-bit. > >Russell Bob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.