Author: Will Singleton
Date: 19:31:30 05/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 17, 2002 at 17:25:02, Tim Foden wrote:
>On May 17, 2002 at 12:01:48, Will Singleton wrote:
>
>>Here's a position that came up today on ICC. Amateur wasn't able to bring home
>>the bacon (but Yace also likes Qa3 for awhile). How about your program?
>>
>>[D]5rk1/p1p3p1/6rp/8/5n1Q/4qbPP/P4N1K/4RRN1 b - - bm Qc3
>
>GLC 2.18, 24MB Hash, AXP1700+ ... changes to Qc3 after 4.14 seconds:
>
> Game stage: Middle game
> Current eval: 2.212
> Ply Time Score Nodes Principal Variation
> 3 0.02 +1.106 5508 Ne2 2. Nd1 Qa3 3. Rxf3 Rxf3 4. Nxe2 Qxa2
> 4 0.03 +1.340 13379 Qa3 2. Qe7 Qxe7 3. Rxe7 Nd5
> 4 0.03 +1.340 15923 Qa3 2. Qe7 Qxe7 3. Rxe7 Nd5
> 5 0.04 +1.341 30709 Qa3 2. Qe7 Qxe7 3. Rxe7 Nd5 4. Rd7
> 5 0.06 +1.341 51051 Qa3 2. Qe7 Qxe7 3. Rxe7 Nd5 4. Rd7
> 6 0.16 +1.480 91600 Qa3 2. Qe7 c5 3. Re3 Qa6 4. Rfe1
> 6 0.19 +1.480 110349 Qa3 2. Qe7 c5 3. Re3 Qa6 4. Rfe1
> 7 0.36 +1.378 283151 Qa3 2. Nh1 Bxh1 3. Rxf4 Bd5 4. Rxf8+ Qxf8 5. Qd4
> Qd6
> 7 0.51 +1.378 462121 Qa3 2. Nh1 Bxh1 3. Rxf4 Bd5 4. Rxf8+ Qxf8 5. Qd4
> Qd6
> 8 0.82 +1.232 778376 Qa3 2. Nh1 Bxh1 3. Rxf4 Bd5 4. Rxf8+ Qxf8 5. Qd4
> Bxa2 6. Qxa7
> 8 1.02 +1.232 1035007 Qa3 2. Nh1 Bxh1 3. Rxf4 Bd5 4. Rxf8+ Qxf8 5. Qd4
> Bxa2 6. Qxa7
> 9 2.04 +1.295 2137430 Qa3 2. Qe7 Qxe7 3. Rxe7 Bc6 4. Re3 Nd5 5. Rf3 Re8
> 6. Nd3
> 9 4.14 +1.351 4205792 Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rxc7 Nd5 4. Rcc1 Ne3 5. Rfe1 Bd5
> 9 4.58 +1.351 4684812 Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rxc7 Nd5 4. Rcc1 Ne3 5. Rfe1 Bd5
> 10 7.19 +1.751 6940330 Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rxc7 Nd5 4. Rcc1 Ne3 5. Rfe1 Bd5
> 6. Re2 Qxc1 {++}
> 10 9.35 +1.850 8945564 Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rc2 Ne6 4. Nxf3 Rxf3 5. Rg1 Rgf6
> 6. Ne4 R6f5
> 10 10.46 +1.850 9995479 Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rc2 Ne6 4. Nxf3 Rxf3 5. Rg1 Rgf6
> 6. Ne4 R6f5
> 11 21.16 +2.115 20070k Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rxc7 Nd5 4. Qc4 Bg2 5. Ne4 Bxf1
> 6. Qxd5+ Kh8 7. Kh1
> 11 24.99 +2.115 24448k Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rxc7 Nd5 4. Qc4 Bg2 5. Ne4 Bxf1
> 6. Qxd5+ Kh8 7. Kh1
> 12 40.52 +2.107 39940k Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rc2 Nd5 4. Re1 Ne3 5. Rd2 Bd5 6.
> Nd3 Re6 7. Qd4
> 12 54.67 +2.107 56658k Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rc2 Nd5 4. Re1 Ne3 5. Rd2 Bd5 6.
> Nd3 Re6 7. Qd4
> 13 1:35 +2.291 96251k Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rc2 Nd5 4. Nh1 Ne3 5. Rxf3 Rxf3
> 6. Nxf3 Nxc2 7. Qc4+ Kh7 8. Qxc2 Qxf3 9. Qxc7
> 13 2:20 +2.291 144791k Qc3 2. Rc1 Qa3 3. Rc2 Nd5 4. Nh1 Ne3 5. Rxf3 Rxf3
> 6. Nxf3 Nxc2 7. Qc4+ Kh7 8. Qxc2 Qxf3 9. Qxc7
> 14 3:30 0/60 Qc3 >exit
> local: t=3:35 nps=1023625.2 n=220057912 (18.9% / 81.1%) fh=87.5%
> total: t=3:35 nps=1023625.2 n=220057912 draws=140038
> trans: probes=41538503 hits=5144787 (12.39%) draft=3694870 (8.90%)
> tcuts: exact=645 (0.00%) upper=2197191 (5.29%) lower=1006896 (2.42%)
> tstor: exact=919 (0.00%) upper=14141545 (68.01%) lower=6650067 (31.98%)
> ext: check=11133417 recap=609457 ppush=1099 1rep=1107968 thrt=0
> q-moves: gen=129571715 tested=63559156 made/un=22735288 max-dep=13
> max eval diff: part-1=3.154 part-2=2.443
>>
>
>Cheers, Tim.
Ack. You're too fast. And is that a million nps? What machine, and how do you
count nps, makemove or calls to search/quiesce?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.