Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:23:18 05/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 17, 2002 at 15:11:58, Ian Aston wrote: >On May 17, 2002 at 13:15:19, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 17, 2002 at 12:24:27, Brian Katz wrote: >> >>>On May 16, 2002 at 19:03:49, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On May 16, 2002 at 19:00:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>These 6 games were played with Nimzo8.ctg and 64 MB hashtable. Average time >>>>>control 4 minutes per move. Final score 3.5 to 2.5 in favor of Hiarcs 8. I would >>>>>like to continue , but these games are too l o n g. >>>>> >>>>>I would like to know if other people can get better results using other Opening >>>>>Books? Even at shorter time control. >>>> >>>>PS: I also have Blitz games if you need to compare them later. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>>I recently ran an engine tournament on my 350 MHz Pent II. >>>Time control 1/1 hash tables set at 8. I have 384 SD RAM. >>>I thought Hiarcs would excel at the longer time controls rather than the shorter >>>time controls. This was with the Hiarcs 8 using the CD book. This was before I >>>downloaded the new upgrade. Fritz 7 used it's own book of course. >>>I was quite suprised with these results. >>> >>>game 1-1 Eatontown 2002 >>> >>> 1 2 3 4 5 >>>1 Hiarcs 8 **** 0½1½ ½11½ 1111 110½ 11.5/16 >>>2 Shredder 6.02 1½0½ **** 0100 001½ 1111 8.5/16 >>>3 Shredder 6 ½00½ 1011 **** ½½½1 0010 7.5/16 >>>4 Fritz 7 0000 110½ ½½½0 **** 1101 7.0/16 >>>5 Crafty 18.14 001½ 0000 1101 0010 **** 5.5/16 >>> >>> >>>In longer time controls Fritz 7 seems to come out quite a bit ahead of Hiarcs 8. >>>Too soon to tell. Any similar results out there? >> >>I have not Hiarcs8 but I am not surprised because Hiarcs was also in the past >>relatively better in blitz. >> >>I see no reason to expect Hiarcs to do better at longer time control. >>It has not special search rules for long time control or special evaluation to >>know things that cannot be discovered by search(for example fortress positions). >> >>Uri > >On the other hand, the programmer says that the Hiarcs 8 search is capable of >reaching 1-3 iterations deeper than Hiarcs 7.32. Surely this must count for >something at longer time controls. I do not see why only at long time control. It should help at all time controls. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.