Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 20:38:26 05/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2002 at 18:47:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Hello, > >With pleasure i announce the results of >gcc 3.1 versus microsoft visual c++ 6.0 >sp4 processor pack. > >Till recently nothing kicked it at the K7, except >intel c++ 5.01 (but newer editions of intel were way >way slower than msvc). > >For DIEP gcc 3.1 is about 5% faster than msvc is. > >Note that msvc 6.0 sp4 + processor pack is about >2% faster than any other msvc version is for me >(at least what everyone can get somehow in the >shop + download). it's 2% faster than msvc 7.0 NET >for example or msvc 6.0 sp5 procpack, because >it seems the optimizations turned on in the processor >pack for msvc 6 sp4 are not working for other service >packs. > >Now a FREE compiler is faster, which is pretty shocking! > >Time to compiler my GUI for linux! Have you tried the .NET compiler? For me, it makes faster binaries than anything else (most of the time). You need to check all the optimization options, including the whole program optimization at the project level.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.