Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 01:03:05 05/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2002 at 23:24:53, pavel wrote: >On May 18, 2002 at 18:47:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>With pleasure i announce the results of >>gcc 3.1 versus microsoft visual c++ 6.0 >>sp4 processor pack. >> >>Till recently nothing kicked it at the K7, except >>intel c++ 5.01 (but newer editions of intel were way >>way slower than msvc). >> >>For DIEP gcc 3.1 is about 5% faster than msvc is. >> >>Note that msvc 6.0 sp4 + processor pack is about >>2% faster than any other msvc version is for me >>(at least what everyone can get somehow in the >>shop + download). it's 2% faster than msvc 7.0 NET >>for example or msvc 6.0 sp5 procpack, because >>it seems the optimizations turned on in the processor >>pack for msvc 6 sp4 are not working for other service >>packs. >> >>Now a FREE compiler is faster, which is pretty shocking! >> >>Time to compiler my GUI for linux! > > >What makes you think the guys at MS makes MSVC for Chess Programs? To the same extent that GCC is made for chess programs. >Speed is only important in Chess Programs (or similar programs thats speed >dependend). > >In speed maybe other compilers are better, but what makes the differance is the >overall performance and features. > >I personally wouldnt care less bashing on MS for this reason. > >If you dont like MSVC use GCC (free save money!), dont like MSWindows, use Linux >(free save money!) Vincent has been "bashing" GCC for months. Now he has exchanged the phrases "GCC" and "MSVC" with each other when the former seemed to be faster for him. I think he is consistent in his posting. Ralf > >Obviously this thread or discussion is not directed towards MS but rather at >Eugene, it doesnt take a genius to figure that out. > > >pavs ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.