Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Nullmove implementation

Author: Pham Minh Tri

Date: 01:46:27 05/20/02

Go up one level in this thread

On May 20, 2002 at 04:04:54, Matthias Gemuh wrote:

>
>Hi Experts,
>
>how can I prove that my nullmove implementation is correct? Or that nullmove
>helps?

It is correct if your new engine:
- searchs more depths. Your engine should search deeper 1-3 depths with same
time as before.
- has same results with test sets (or may be very slighly different).
- has same or better tournament scores vs other engines: The scores of new one
should not be lower than old ones (usually they are better because of 1-3 extra
depths).

>
>Thanks,
>Matthias.

• Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 01:54:20 05/20/02
  • Re: Nullmove implementation Matthias Gemuh 02:49:02 05/20/02
    • Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 03:00:05 05/20/02
      • Re: Nullmove implementation Benny Antonsson 07:23:13 05/20/02
        • Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 09:51:27 05/20/02
          • Re: Nullmove implementation Benny Antonsson 16:49:32 05/20/02
      • Re: Nullmove implementation Matthias Gemuh 04:45:25 05/20/02
        • Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 05:15:26 05/20/02
          • Re: Nullmove implementation Vincent Diepeveen 08:23:22 05/21/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.