Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Nullmove implementation

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 01:54:20 05/20/02

Go up one level in this thread

On May 20, 2002 at 04:46:27, Pham Minh Tri wrote:

>On May 20, 2002 at 04:04:54, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>
>>
>>Hi Experts,
>>
>>how can I prove that my nullmove implementation is correct? Or that nullmove
>>helps?
>
>It is correct if your new engine:
>- searchs more depths. Your engine should search deeper 1-3 depths with same
>time as before.
>- has same results with test sets (or may be very slighly different).

I think the result in test suites should be better.

At least my experience says that null move pruning improved the results in test
suites and not only in games.

Uri

• Re: Nullmove implementation Matthias Gemuh 02:49:02 05/20/02
  • Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 03:00:05 05/20/02
    • Re: Nullmove implementation Benny Antonsson 07:23:13 05/20/02
      • Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 09:51:27 05/20/02
        • Re: Nullmove implementation Benny Antonsson 16:49:32 05/20/02
    • Re: Nullmove implementation Matthias Gemuh 04:45:25 05/20/02
      • Re: Nullmove implementation Uri Blass 05:15:26 05/20/02
        • Re: Nullmove implementation Vincent Diepeveen 08:23:22 05/21/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.