Author: Martin Andersen
Date: 09:44:53 05/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2002 at 04:52:00, Uri Blass wrote: > >I guess that Lambchop comes back as freeware because it is not strong enough and >is slightly weaker than Crafty based on peter's opinion. > >About yace I do not know the reason that Dieter did not choose to do it >commercial. > >I hope that at least he is not going to give for free a version that is clearly >better than the latest yace. Why not ? I don't mind having a strong program for free. It's up to the author. Nobody can tell him to charge for the program. It could affect the sale of the commercial programs, but competition is healthy. Actually, if strength and price alone decided which program normal people would use, then 99% would choose Crafty or Yace for example. These 99% would get their asses kicked by these programs. Instead, commercial programmers should focus on nice GUI and new features. Martin. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.