Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 fastest compiler at K7 !!

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 08:28:44 05/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 2002 at 16:30:39, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On May 20, 2002 at 12:54:40, Daniel Clausen wrote:
>
>>On May 19, 2002 at 23:42:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>The result is that finally I'm going to switch to XP. It is waiting for me on
>>>the other partition of my hard disk (that so far I never boot).  :(
>>
>>Too bad you're bound to a platform with lots of people behind it, since that's
>>how you earn your money. Otherwise I could tell you some alternatives. ;)
>>
>>Sargon
>
>
>
>The problem is not the number of customers using the system.
>
>Actually my developpement system is DOS with the free GCC compiler.
>
>I compile the Windows version when I need to publish an update, that's all. I
>could very well use Linux as my developpement system (I would just keep the GCC
>compiler).
>
>But I want a system that:
>1) has a big enough community
>2) I can safely advice to friends and family
>
>
>Point number 1 is almost OK with Linux. For point number 2, Linux is clearly a
>bad choice (so far).
>
>Actually what the world needs is a low priced Windows clone. It's not very
>important if the OS core is Linux or NT (they look quite similar to me).

Note even close. NT is in every aspect better than linux except for 2
  a) it is free
  b) source code is available

however a & b do not count for 99.9% of the computer users on this planet.

Saying linux has a market share of 5% of the computer users is complete
nonsense. It's more like 0.05%.


>The KDE project is probably on the right track, if they manage to get the
>fanatics out of the project.
>    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.