Author: José Carlos
Date: 10:11:04 05/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2002 at 12:34:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 21, 2002 at 12:20:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On May 21, 2002 at 11:07:46, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On May 21, 2002 at 10:13:29, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>The answer is as simple as clear. >>> >>>They can use programs to analyze games with from other GMs >>>and themselves. They can use it to analyze variations from their >>>openings preparation with. >>> >>>But they can't learn from it. >> >> >>What about tactically, can a player less than 2400 learn a few tricks from the >>best programs? >> >>Jorge > >GMs know tactically more than programs, so you can analyze with them, >but not learn from them. The computer doesnt 'show' a new pattern concept >to you. So you don't learn from the computer something. You can learn >yourself only when analyzing with computers, that's why i say you can't >learn FROM the computer. I disagree, Vincent. You can learn from the computer. It is the computer that can't teach you. No matter from what, human beings spend the whole life learning. From everything. You learn geology from stones, zoology from animals, physics from the planets and stars. They don't teach you anything. It's _you_ that observe, make a theory, test it and draw conclusions. You can do exactly the same from a computer. You play against it; it wins; you study the game; guess why you lost; play again; maybe you force the same opening and change a move or a plan... Finally, you draw conclusions. And your source of information is, in that case, Fritz!!! :) José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.