Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:39:40 05/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2002 at 13:34:32, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 21, 2002 at 12:34:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >[snip] >>GMs know tactically more than programs, so you can analyze with them, >>but not learn from them. The computer doesnt 'show' a new pattern concept >>to you. So you don't learn from the computer something. You can learn >>yourself only when analyzing with computers, that's why i say you can't >>learn FROM the computer. > >What about a novelty discovered from long time analysis by some program? If the you don't 'learn' from that. by analysing you find a novelty then. Only because YOU put up this position at the computer and took a move serious the computer spit out some output. If i play 1.e4,e5 2.Nf3,Nc6 3.Bb5 or Bc4 and let tiger think long it spits out h6. Interesting novelty for CAPII project don't you think Dann? >GM remembered the novelty and used it, wouldn't that be learning from a >computer? > >What about probing a desired line for deep tactical shots? >I don't think computers will show GM's any techniques. But I think they can >demonstrate facts. The GM's can make important inferences from these facts.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.