Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 02:12:17 05/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2002 at 13:01:14, José Carlos wrote: >On May 21, 2002 at 12:34:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On May 21, 2002 at 12:20:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On May 21, 2002 at 11:07:46, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On May 21, 2002 at 10:13:29, K. Burcham wrote: >>>> >>>>The answer is as simple as clear. >>>> >>>>They can use programs to analyze games with from other GMs >>>>and themselves. They can use it to analyze variations from their >>>>openings preparation with. >>>> >>>>But they can't learn from it. >>> >>> >>>What about tactically, can a player less than 2400 learn a few tricks from the >>>best programs? >>> >>>Jorge >> >>GMs know tactically more than programs, so you can analyze with them, >>but not learn from them. The computer doesnt 'show' a new pattern concept >>to you. So you don't learn from the computer something. You can learn >>yourself only when analyzing with computers, that's why i say you can't >>learn FROM the computer. > > I disagree, Vincent. You can learn from the computer. It is the computer that >can't teach you. > No matter from what, human beings spend the whole life learning. From >everything. You learn geology from stones, zoology from animals, physics from >the planets and stars. > They don't teach you anything. It's _you_ that observe, make a theory, test it >and draw conclusions. You can do exactly the same from a computer. You play >against it; it wins; you study the game; guess why you lost; play again; maybe >you force the same opening and change a move or a plan... Finally, you draw >conclusions. And your source of information is, in that case, Fritz!!! :) > > José C. -------------- Hi Jose, I think you are very correct with your explanation! Good answer! Regards, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.