Author: Claudio A. Amorim
Date: 04:29:38 05/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
I´d like to hear some GM on this subject, which is part of my Master Thesis! Regards all, Claudio. On May 21, 2002 at 10:13:29, K. Burcham wrote: > >not discussing opening book moves. >not discussing egtb's. >not discussing a pawn promotion. > > > >lets start out saying GM eval is 0, and program eval is 0. >lots of time left on both clocks. time is not an issue. > >the GM makes a move and plays what he sees as a safe move. >GM took three minutes to move, but he cannot see the material winning >combination for the program. >the program takes three more minutes to see material winning move. >finally program plays winning move, and GM can see combination. > >program wins. > >If GM's cannot learn strategy from programs, if GM's can only learn tactics, >then the question is: in the above described game , it would seem that most of >the time the GM cannot learn tactics either. if the combination is too deep for >the GM to see he loses material, then he cannot see this in another game. > >Just wondering how a GM can learn from home practice with programs. >it would seem that in a postion were the GM could play a losing move and he >cannot see the deep combination, but the program can, he could not have won >anyway. > >maybe some will answer that this is not possible. maybe some will say there >is no posiiton that the program can see winning material but GM cannot. > >of course i am not refering to an simple oversight by the GM. i am not refering >to a simple human blunder. i am refering to a situation that the GM says he >could not see the combination until it was played out. > >kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.