Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: But how strong would a new Colossus, new Mchess or new Wchess...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:39:13 05/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 22, 2002 at 13:30:01, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>I have aready tested Sargon V against some top programs, sargon, of course,
>running im my fastest system. Result: Sargon falled in flames. As you see those
>games, the flaws becomes at once apparent: not enough good book -very shallow in
>Sargon case- , not enough ending knowledge - "So King and a pawn in H or A file
>not neccesarily win?"- and disgusting positional decisions. No matter how much
>deeper the search goes in current hardware, the loved little monster show his
>failures. Not a match for any of my actual beast.


I think that it may be interesting to test sargon V against amatuers.

What is it's result against My program Movei on equal hardware?
Movei today also does not have endgame knowledge except piece square table for
the king and the fact that KB vs K or KN vs K is a draw.

It may be also interesting to know how much speed advantage does it need in
order to beat the commercial programs.

Is sargon V on the best hardware of today better than palm tiger?

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.