Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 17:25:22 05/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2002 at 14:53:37, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On May 22, 2002 at 14:45:29, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>> >>>So far for Fritz superiority, if there ever was any. The difference >>>is almost completely gone and certainly not significant. >> >>So perhabs it is in the future more possible to talk about the playingstyle of >>the programs.A good attacker is more import as 30 elo more or less. > >Oh, I'd take the 30 ELO more anyday. It's just that no program seems >to be 30 ELO stronger than any other at the moment. But please notice this is a list of computer against computer.This 30 Elopoints say not much about the strength against a human master. > >I must admit I love Junior 7's style, junior 7 has definitive the wrong name.This program is the genius of the 21th century in computerchess.Sometines i can´t believe it is only a computerprogram. but for analyzing, I'll take >the strongest program. hey, come on, junior 7 is one of the strongest.I think you mean less speculative and so nearer to the normal style of nonprofessional human chessplayer. > >>Steen had forgotten to implemet UCI.Caissa likes the UCI protocoll. > >:) > >Me like UCI too :) Wonderfull to hear.Thank for sjeng.It attacks often a white pawn on f4 with the the break ..g7-g5.That´s a good job for a chessprogram. I hope you have the time in the future to implemente pv in sjeng. Grettings TL > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.