Author: pavel
Date: 18:21:16 05/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2002 at 18:23:43, stuart taylor wrote: >I would say Black can in fact win. Don't worry about Fritz. >Black can restle that white Q-side pawn off the board (with help king) and Queen >his own Q-side pawn, or atleast get a good piece for it and win. > The Night is weak in this position, and Black can also forestall any >breakthroughs from White on the Q-side, even without his king being in that >area. >I think a human master would have resigned too. >Why take Fritz as an authority? Is Fritz what you are basing your conclusions >on??? >S.Taylor Actually I never said black cannot win. There is a very good possibility that black will win. My point of the post was refer to bug that might have been causing Arasan resign in an almost winning position. There is no perticular reason to choose DFritz, it was randomly choosen, anything that Came out in front of me. I could have choosed Fritz7 Shredder6 Gambit Tiger or any chess program I wished. And most probably all would agree with Deep fritz more or less, because it didnt seem to be a very complicated position for a Computer program. If I wanted to bash on any program, then I would probably take on TSCP. because, this is a winning game for black (atleast against me) pavs ps, by the way Arasan resigned in a winning position, you probably read the position wrong.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.