Author: Jorge
Date: 11:52:46 05/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2002 at 07:00:40, Peter Fendrich wrote: >On May 21, 2002 at 18:07:04, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>Hiarcs 8.0 Test [with H8_tour.ctg] >>Engine Match, Fritz6-GUI, ponder=off, 4 men TB's >>Athlon 1.3/256, with 64 MB hashtables >>30-50 games per match at time control 120'/60 >>download of games at the end of our test >>by chessfriend Rolf Bühler, Zürich >>Published by Kurt Utzinger, Switzerland >>**************************************************** >> >> >><pre> >>Hia8_Shr602 Ath 1.3/64 120'/60 >>Zurich, 2002.05.16 - 2002.05.20 >> Score 12345678901234567890 >>---------------------------------------------------- >> 1: Shredder 6.02 11.0 / 20 1110=101000==11=0101 >> 2: Hiarcs 8 9.0 / 20 0001=010111==00=1010 >>---------------------------------------------------- >>20 games: +11 =4 -5</pre> >> >> >><pre> >>Hiarcs8_Fritz7 Ath 1.3/64 >>Zurich, 2002.05.16 - 2002.05.21 >> Score 12345678901234567890 >>----------------------------------------------- >> 1: Fritz 7 13.0 / 20 10=1101==11====110=1 >> 2: Hiarcs 8 7.0 / 20 01=0010==00====001=0 >>----------------------------------------------- >>20 games: +4 =8 -8 >></pre> > >If you apply the Trinomial distribution you will get: >Shredder 6.02 is better than Hiarcs 8: 69% probability >Fritz 7 is better than Hiarcs 8 : 95% probability > >"is better than" in this case means "will beat the same opponent in a new match >under the same conditions". > >Regards >Peter Hi Peter, I am not certain how you came up with these figures. Could you enlighten me please? Thanks, jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.