Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 18:29:35 07/27/98
Go up one level in this thread
>>>Wish we knew more about why he adopted a more open and "normal" >>>style of play against Rebel, while simply strangling Fritz... >>Remember "anti-GM"? >>Perhaps Anand was forced too? >>- Ed - >Nice marketing. :) >But anti-GM didn't make him castle queen-side in the first long game. He >did that on his own. I don't think an "anti-GM" strategy exists, much less >one that can force a GM to do something he doesn't want to do... Why should Anand play moves that are not optimal in his opinion? Quite dangerous IMO. I think you should re-read the goals of anti-GM, the why's, its birth. In the past at AEGON I have seen Rebel losing against grandmasters without any chance. After such a game it is very frustrating to realize your program didn't have just ONE little chance on counter play. anti-GM is about to deal with this problem. I don't know how good it is as 8 games is not much but in most of the 8 games it was Rebel who took the initiative which pleased me very much as this exactly is one of the goals of anti-GM. - Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.