Author: blass uri
Date: 21:30:53 07/27/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1998 at 18:42:16, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi don: >Yes, you are right. It is also a feature of this people to be extremely arrogant >and self confident in an outrageous way to others. Not only the think of his >positions as better than they are, but always the adversary is a piece of shit, >a corny, old, stupid, worn out kind of guy. I suppose this is part of the >psychics preparations to fight. >And there is another reason to the unwillingness of GM to face computers: no >matter the strenght they have, -computers- they are always dangerous in tactical >terms and does not give room to mistakes so you cannot aply what you know of >shock tactics, you cannot use tricks, you are not going to trash them by >forceful moves I can use tricks if the tricks are long enough. even deeper blue did a tactical mistake in the match against kasparov in game 2 when it gave kasparov an opportunity to force a draw. Uri >and at the same time they benefits of any mistake you commit in >that area. That very fact, to face an adversary that is perfect in an area, no >matter how narrow the area, is tiresome. Have'n t you ever been defeated by a >mere 1600 program because of that? I have been or I should have been without >take backs tactical moves... For a GMI that expect to trash very fast at least >some of the competence with just automatic use of tactical shots, a computer is >a bloodu nuissance that does not give credit if you win, but harms a lot if you >lose. >Cheers >Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.