Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:02:30 05/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2002 at 00:01:02, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 23, 2002 at 20:43:18, martin fierz wrote: > >>On May 23, 2002 at 19:37:34, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>I Thought some of you might be interested that if you play through this movie >>>slowly you can clearly see Deep Blue's PV and other stuff. It looks like in one >>>scene that Deep Blue was using Xboard. I don't know what else you can decipher >>>from any of this but it is the clearest thing i've seen. >>> >>> >>>http://www.chessbase.de/vw_phaeton_kasparov.mov >> >>what i saw was that the footage of kasparov was probably from the infamous game >>6 in the second match - you can see him go 5. ...Ng8-f6 - and two moves later he >>will lose the match with ...h6?? ... > >Kasparov did not lose the 6th game by h6. > >The problem was that kasparov did not know how to play later and did many >mistakes. > >The first one of them was Qe7 when I believe that a simple capture of the knight >by fxe6 can win the game. > >I rememeber that I tried to play Genius3 against itself after fxe6 in unequal >time control after the match and black won the game inspite of the fact that I >gave white more time. > >30 minutes/move for white and 3 minutes/move for black on p100 at that time. > >Uri You are making same mistake like kasparov. Using a program from 1997 which is very passive. What you should have used is a very aggressive program like nimzo98. Deep Blue had mobility, whatever primitif it was, it DID attack in such positions with material down. Obviously Kasparov's b5?? is a major blunder against a computer too. Nevertheless my guess is Deep Blue would have won anyway after h6. With Qe7 or without Qe7. It would have played active in that position. Plays easy for computers.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.