Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:21:59 05/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2002 at 11:03:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 24, 2002 at 10:04:25, Chris Carson wrote: > >an XP1900 from rebel could be faster than a slow quad where >it's going to play on i guess. > >Perhaps it even goes play on a cheap dual K7 which is way >faster than any of the mentionned machines. Can you prove it?, provide us with the results of any match that you have seen or have done lately. > >where do you get a $100k quad from? Who ever mentioned a Quad on any of the previous posts? > >>On May 24, 2002 at 08:21:17, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Fritz performance was NOT greater than 2650 and I doubt that if they would >>>paired it against GM Smirin it would have won at least one game. Deep fritz will >>>be using an 8X system against GM Kramnik, that has a difference of more than 200 >>>rating points over GM Gulko and is a better player than GM Smirin. >>>I doubt if Deep Fritz will gain more than 150 raring points by using an 8x >>>system at standard time control. Also those games that GM Gulko played were at >>>G/60 plus 10 seconds per move. I just wonder why Chessbase is scare to match >>>their best programs at standard time control, like Mr. Schoeder with Rebel. >>>Chessbase doesn't even want to match their best programs at G/90 plus 5 seconds >>>per move, which to my judgement GM Gulko , GM Seirawan, or GM Smirin would >>>demonstrate that the programs are NOT yet over 2600 against them, even if they >>>use the latest Intel Pentium IV 2.53 Ghz. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>Ofcourse you can think what you like. >> >>I expect the 8x machine that D.Fritz plays on will give a 2650 performance. I >>think DF or DJ is 2750 (tournament, not match) on the 8x box. This match will >>be against a 2800 player that is well prepared. 100 points seems to be the loss >>for a computer (on average) when paired against a well prepared GM in match >>play. >> >>On single proc AMD or Intel boxes, Fritz, Junior, Tiger, Hiarcs and Rebel are >>2650 (actually 2680 when results from 800Mhz and faster machine results are >>calculated). Rebel had a 2700 performance against a well prepared (100 games of >>preparation) 2700 GM using an AMD 1900+. These are Standard FIDE and 40/2 >>results. >> >>Yes, you will see some performances above and below (200 - 400 points) the >>average ELO for the programs, but the same is true for the GM's, check TWIC. >> >>GM's (strong GM's) have to play flawless chess with white pieces and use >>anti-computer (closed positions) to defeat the computers. Typical or average >>GM's get beat by the programs on a regular basis. >> >>Enjoy this time. Today, GM's below 2600 have a very hard time with the >>computers, in 3 years it will be GM's below 2700 on single processor boxex. In >>3 years on the 8x box, well, only the 2800 GM's will have a chance. Besides the >>speed improvement, there is impressive sw improvement. In 5 years (+ or - 2 >>years) the machines will rule this game. They will still lose every once in a >>while, but it will be very rare.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.