Author: Ian Osgood
Date: 10:59:00 05/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2002 at 01:40:54, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 23, 2002 at 21:11:35, stuart taylor wrote: > >> From existing results, how is it looking? >>S.Taylor > >Not good. > >The fast searchers like chess system tal and Comet simply kill it. >I expected them to win but with results like 11-9 or 12-8. > >I remember 14.5-5.5 for chess system tal and 7.5-2.5 for Comet. > >It seems based on these results that palm tiger is not going to get more than >2100 sddf rating. > >Uri I don't understand why the SSDF is playing a 20 MHz Palm program against 200MHz computers. Especially when there is such a clear stratification of processor speeds on the rating list. Wouldn't people be more interested in results against dedicated chess computers with similar processor speeds? Aren't matches with opponents roughly equal in strength also more likely to give statistically significant results? I want to see matches against the dedicateds at bottom of the list: TASC R30 v. 2.5 (2274) Meph Genius 68 030 33 MHz (2195) Berlin Pro 68 020 24 MHz (2125) Atlanta SH7000 20 MHz (2089) Sapphire II (2009) Ian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.