Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:29:52 05/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2002 at 13:59:00, Ian Osgood wrote:
>On May 24, 2002 at 01:40:54, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On May 23, 2002 at 21:11:35, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>> From existing results, how is it looking?
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>>Not good.
>>
>>The fast searchers like chess system tal and Comet simply kill it.
>>I expected them to win but with results like 11-9 or 12-8.
>>
>>I remember 14.5-5.5 for chess system tal and 7.5-2.5 for Comet.
>>
>>It seems based on these results that palm tiger is not going to get more than
>>2100 sddf rating.
>>
>>Uri
>
>I don't understand why the SSDF is playing a 20 MHz Palm program against 200MHz
>computers. Especially when there is such a clear stratification of processor
>speeds on the rating list. Wouldn't people be more interested in results
>against dedicated chess computers with similar processor speeds? Aren't matches
>with opponents roughly equal in strength also more likely to give statistically
>significant results?
>
>I want to see matches against the dedicateds at bottom of the list:
>
>TASC R30 v. 2.5 (2274)
>Meph Genius 68 030 33 MHz (2195)
>Berlin Pro 68 020 24 MHz (2125)
>Atlanta SH7000 20 MHz (2089)
>Sapphire II (2009)
>
>Ian
I'm think the SSDF tester who owns a Palm (Tony) does not have access to these
dedicated computers.
He has to do with what's available to him.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.