Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:24:03 05/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2002 at 07:06:49, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On May 25, 2002 at 03:55:58, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-05-22 86121 games played by 240 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2730 33 -31 494 64% 2626 >> 2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2722 33 -32 477 63% 2626 >> 3 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2720 34 -33 441 62% 2635 >> 4 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2714 33 -32 482 63% 2623 >> 5 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2713 35 -34 432 64% 2611 >> 6 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2693 31 -31 511 57% 2641 >> >>Shredder 6.32 (CB version) is 27 points behind Fritz 7 >> >> 7 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684 34 -32 470 64% 2585 >> 8 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2670 31 -30 536 56% 2624 >> 9 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2653 34 -33 430 54% 2625 >> 10 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2652 23 -23 945 61% 2570 >> 11 Gandalf 5.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2646 29 -28 595 57% 2594 >> 12 Gandalf 5.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2642 49 -50 202 46% 2673 >> 13 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2640 30 -29 592 66% 2521 >> 14 Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2631 45 -44 250 56% 2592 >> 14 Junior 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2631 27 -26 739 67% 2507 >> 16 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2630 28 -27 652 62% 2541 >> 16 Shredder 6.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2630 65 -62 124 57% 2578 >> 18 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 23 -22 1014 63% 2529 >> >>Shredder 6.0 (UCI version) is 1 point behind Fritz 7 >> >> SSDF comment >> >>We have played 124 games with the UCI-version of >>Shredder 6.0 K6-2 450 MHz, using the opening book of >>Sandro Necchi. So far the rating is 2630. With so few >>games it's difficult to draw any conclusions concerning >>which opening book Shredder 6.0 might benefit most from. >> >>My comment: >> >>What is 26 points difference? >> >>Apparently NOTHING:-)) >> >>No other comments are needed. >> >>Sandro Necchi > >Accounting for the statistical uncertainties, your conclusions are not on a safe >base. But this is also quite generally true for the first rankings in this list. > >I personally wouldn't care too much if engine A is ahead of engine B by 18 >points when the statistical uncertatinty is order of 30 points or above. > >Uli there are major differences Uli, If you are at #1 spot, then you are the clear #1. If you aren't, then you suck. Something else you can't sell to the world. They use the UCI version everywhere, Necchi book hardly gets used. the shredder6.ctg is a major joke simply. It's a kind fritz7 book without tournament book, so by definition weaker. Then suddenly shredder looks like best engine isn't it? Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.