Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 09:58:28 05/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2002 at 11:18:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 25, 2002 at 09:48:14, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On May 25, 2002 at 03:55:58, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-05-22 86121 games played by 240 computers >>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>> 1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2730 33 -31 494 64% 2626 >>> 2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2722 33 -32 477 63% 2626 >>> 3 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2720 34 -33 441 62% 2635 >>> 4 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2714 33 -32 482 63% 2623 >>> 5 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2713 35 -34 432 64% 2611 >>> 6 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2693 31 -31 511 57% 2641 >>> >>>Shredder 6.32 (CB version) is 27 points behind Fritz 7 >> >> >>In fact Shredder is *17* points behind Fritz 7. ;-) >>2730 - 2713 :-) >> >> >>> 14 Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2631 45 -44 250 56% 2592 >>> 14 Junior 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2631 27 -26 739 67% 2507 >> >> >>Shouldn't be the program listed higher which has a smaller margin of error (= >>has played more games)? >> >> >>> 16 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2630 28 -27 652 62% 2541 >>> 16 Shredder 6.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2630 65 -62 124 57% 2578 >>> 18 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 23 -22 1014 63% 2529 >>> >>>Shredder 6.0 (UCI version) is 1 point behind Fritz 7 >>> >>> SSDF comment >>> >>>We have played 124 games with the UCI-version of >>>Shredder 6.0 K6-2 450 MHz, using the opening book of >>>Sandro Necchi. So far the rating is 2630. With so few >>>games it's difficult to draw any conclusions concerning >>>which opening book Shredder 6.0 might benefit most from. >>> >>>My comment: >>> >>>What is 26 points difference? >>> >>>Apparently NOTHING:-)) >>> >>>No other comments are needed. >>> >>>Sandro Necchi >> >> >>Exactly. And that is why I've been saying for ages that at least the top-5 >>programs play on ONE level. None of them is really significant stronger than the >>others. > >We know this, but this is not reality. For 99.9% of the worldpopulation >it doesn't matter whether you are at 0.0001 difference at number 2, >or at 1000 difference. > >The first one is the winner and the rest has lost. I do not know if this counts statistically, but Fritz seems to kling to the top spot quite a lot. That, and of course that it has a small margin to the rest, makes me feel it is just a little bit stronger. Torstein
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.