Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess-specific Compiler & Operating System Issues [Continued]

Author: pavel

Date: 19:37:58 05/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 25, 2002 at 22:26:50, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On May 25, 2002 at 22:02:09, Robert Henry Durrett wrote:
>
>>All that discussion, although very interesting was not directly about chess
>>programming.
>>
>>What I am trying to say is that I would like to see the linkage between the
>>general discussions, applicable to all computer software professionals, and the
>>rarified world of the "chess programmers."
>>
>>How, for example, does a typical chess programmer select the language,
>
>The one he has been using for 15 years is probably going to be his/her choice.
>I have been programming in C since 1982 so it sounds like a good choice for me.
>I also do a lot of C++ programming (since 1989) and so that is a plausible
>alternative.  I have done professional programming in FORTRAN, but that would
>not be a good choice for me because I am rusty.  I have also done professional
>programming in several other languages, but they do not lend themselves
>particularly well to chess.
>
>>compiler,
>
>Usually, performance will dictate this.  If a new, faster compiler appears
>(faster binaries generated -- not speed of compilation) then programmers will
>swarm to it like sharks in a pool of water laced with blood and wobbling wounded
>fish.
>
>>operating system,
>
>Whichever one they like best and have the most experience on.  Some people like
>Linux because it is trendy and flies in the face of MS which is a popular
>bashing target at the moment too and will therefore pick Linux even with less
>experience.  There are also a lot of nice programming tools for UNIX type
>systems like Linux, but they are not very "user friendly."
>
>>and programming environment
>
>This one is a religious war for sure.  People will swear by and about things
>like editors and IDE's and mostly they only tout the one they know and the one
>that they bash is just as good.  We tend to like anything once we learn it
>thoroughly and find that it accomplishes all that we wish from it.
>
>>he/she will use for his/her
>>chess-related programming?



Dann, do you know of any program that is written "completely" in assembly?

pavs



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.