Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 01:22:31 05/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2002 at 03:44:07, Harald Faber wrote: >On May 25, 2002 at 16:02:54, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On May 25, 2002 at 15:50:30, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>Hi Harald, >> >>I think we can agree that Fritz is very strong in playing 40 games >>matches. But I do agree partly with your statement below. You can >>just count how many important tournaments Fritz has won in the last >>5 till 10 years. In that respect Shredder and Junior (f.e.) have >>had more credits :-) > > >Don't forget that even counting numerous tournament results, you still get much >less games than SSDF has played, so one also could say that single tournament >results have almost no statistical meaning. > They have a statistical meaning when Shredder wins every championchip and Fritz wins no championchip. > >>All in all I think that Fritz is best for long matches like in Sweden. >>But Shredder, Junior and also Tiger are better tournament players. > > >And what do you think WHY is Fritz doing better in SSDF/long matches? > > >>Still, I have the idea that Fritz knows a lot more about chess than >>earlier versions. > > >No doubt. > > >>Of course sometimes it has no understanding, but that >>counts for all other programs as well. > > >Yes, but IMO the others are not that often so blind. > > >>Furthermore, it is quite an >>achievement to top the SSDF list for so long! On the other hand, the >>top spot in the SSDF is no guarantee for succes in tournaments :-) >> >>Jeroen > > >Although Fritz rarely wins tournaments, the result often is in the top-3 or >top-5
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.