Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:28:06 05/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2002 at 02:57:26, Martin Schubert wrote: >>>I think we can agree that Fritz is very strong in playing 40 games >>>matches. But I do agree partly with your statement below. You can >>>just count how many important tournaments Fritz has won in the last >>>5 till 10 years. In that respect Shredder and Junior (f.e.) have >>>had more credits :-) >>> >>>All in all I think that Fritz is best for long matches like in Sweden. >>>But Shredder, Junior and also Tiger are better tournament players. >> >> >>Of course you can be right but your guess isn't better then anyone elses. >>It's only based on wishes and strange theories. Are you sure that you know what >>you mean with better tournament player!? >> >>Bertil > >He does the same thing as SSDF does. He counts results. If you look in the past >and count how many times Fritz was number one in sweden and compare to the >number how often it won big tournaments you come to the conclusion that Fritz is >better in longer matches. >That's not a strange thing because for example book learning is quite important >in long matches. In tournaments it doesn't matter at all. > >Regards, Martin Yes, that correct. But we neglect that in the self-reflection of SSDF they are doing the "real" testing and get the "real" rankings. Only we outside the SSDF know that this is not the case at all. They are just counting on uncontrolled bases. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.