Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:34:50 07/28/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 1998 at 14:42:03, Howard Exner wrote: >On July 28, 1998 at 04:04:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I don't know of many players that would castle opposite in a >>serious game against a computer, on general principles if nothing else... > >What is your assessment of who has the upper hand in attacking the king >- a computer or an equally strong human? There's little doubt that a human is better. But why roll the dice when you can lay them face up any way you want. In a Stonewall, the human has nothing to worry about except developing and parrying small threats. But when you castle opposite, you can overlook something, and when you do, it is often "critical"... IE I want the program's king exposed, but *mine* safely tucked away. In this game, anything could happen, and almost did...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.