Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:40:28 05/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2002 at 07:09:24, Jeroen Noomen wrote: Even then it is slower Jeroen. the default wcrafty.exe at bob's site is the intel c++ 6.0 compiler which is of course NOT going to make a fast executable for the K7. Instead it is slower than any other compiler at the K7 is. Not to mention gcc 3.1 which has special K7 optimizations AND branch prediction reordering. Obviously with a million dollar you could buy a cool 4 processor McKinley system or so. Each CPU already gets like 1.5 million nodes a second for crafty (at 1 Ghz a cpu). >On May 27, 2002 at 05:39:40, Slater Wold wrote: > >If Intel needs 0,8 GHz to outsmart AMD by a mere 10% and asks a huge amount of >money for it, then to me it is clear that AMD is the clear winner here. > >Jeroen > >PS Yes, I have read your complete mail and I know you don't want to include >prizes in this test. But in that case I can come up with some other $ 1 million >piece of hardware that outsearches Intel by ....% :-)) > > >>So, if you want the fastest CPU on the market, well, that's going to be the P4 >>2.53Ghz. Because it is, just that, the fastest CPU on the market.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.