Author: Slater Wold
Date: 05:00:35 05/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
Like I said Vince, throw me any EXE you want, and I guarantee the plain 'ol exe off Hyatt's site will beat any Crafty EXE you can give. I used the beloved Intel 5.0 to build an exe for the AMD, and it was still slower. And everyone knows, you CANNOT get a faster exe than that. On May 27, 2002 at 07:43:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 27, 2002 at 07:19:34, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On May 27, 2002 at 07:07:21, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>If you auto test then in a short match of 20 games it could go either way, since >>>for chess, the speed difference is NOT noticeable. >>> >>>Jorge. >> >>Chess is not all I do. Nor is it all anyone does on their PC. > >>100% (literally) better graphics than the AMD, using the same video card. > >bandwidth is bigger on P4 sure. > >>30% faster encoding video. 15% faster encoding MP3's. > >same as above. this is all bandwidth limited. > >>These are *not* marginal victories. These are HUGE gains. >> >>I said in my original post, that I was interested in chess performance, but >>let's be honest here for a second, most people who have a PC don't have a chess >>program installed. >> >>Bottom line: Whatever you do with your Intel P4 2.53Ghz machine, it will be >>faster than my AMD 1.73Ghz machine. If that's by 10% or 100%, it's going to be >>faster. > >Not at all. Note that gcc also works under windows (they say), >but the important thing is that there are at least 2 compilers for >windows from which 1 is a very important compiler the visual c++ compiler, >which is way faster for the K7 than intel is. > >You got fooled again by the intel compiler. > >Please look at specint and you'll see that most tests they use intel c++ >compiled executables. > >It's sick.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.