Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 05:51:04 05/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
>It seems better both with respect to speed and accuracy to deal with this >problem at the root, if possible. I think its impossible. Your safety-margin idea doesnt really work because the point of a qsearch termination is indeterminable (nice pun huh). >After all, scores probably don't change much from a 45 ply search to a 60 ply >search (theoreticly), but the strange scores you get around ply 60 by cutting >may change the scores all the way up the tree, I don't know. > >Perhaps the best would be to completely remove the depth limit and just let it >go as deep as it can in the given timeframe? That doesnt work either. Or all your arrays that hold takeBack Information for example get far oversized. Georg
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.