Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 12:41:29 05/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2002 at 12:36:02, Terry McCracken wrote: >On May 27, 2002 at 12:00:34, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On May 27, 2002 at 11:47:15, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>The P-4 on the 0.13 micron process, has the potential to exceed 5Ghz easily, >>>maybe even 10Ghz! It won't get even to 4GHz on 0.13 micron process. Already at 3GHz it has serious thermal issues. Read this thread: http://www.flickerdown.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=448 >>Not really, just ask how much watt the P4 at 2.53 generates and how >>much watt it eats and you will soon realize that they might try >>to clock the sucking part of the processor higher, but that won't >>speed them up much. > >Nonsense.. keep abreast of intels technology, their tranistors are more advanced >and run cooler than AMD. AMD are _not_ more advanced than Intel. The transistors are probably identical, it's the chip design and process technology that matters here. Intel probably is better in this regard. >>They need a complete redesign of the cpu, as the L1 is completely >>integrated into the cpu in order to get faster. > >That's extreem, however I agree they need to develope the processor further >and I'm certain they will, the P-4 is in it's infancy. >> >>>The P-4 is still under developement and by the time they reduce it to a .09 and >>>.06 micron process, and they will, it will hit speeds of 20Ghz+ maybe 30Ghz+ and >>>all this by 2005 to 2007! Not a chance, IMO. I give it at most 10GHz before they have to design a completely new core. I could be wrong. >>Even if you clock the P4 to 40 Ghz it will be kicked by a 1Ghz McKinley. No, McKinley isn't that good. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.