Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz 7,0,0,8 better results than Fritz 7,0,0,7 Check the results

Author: Brian Katz

Date: 21:00:01 05/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 27, 2002 at 23:16:41, Joseph Merolle wrote:

>You failed to mention time controls can you do one with 40 in 2 time controls
>
>regards Joseph
>
>On May 27, 2002 at 20:11:27, Brian Katz wrote:
>
>>game 1/1 Eatontown  2002 All engines 8 MB Hash Tables (Hiarcs 8 CD opening book)
>>Crafty used Fritz 7 book, all others used their own opening book.
>>	                  1	  2	  3	  4	  5
>>1	Hiarcs 8	 ****	 0½1½	 ½11½	 1111	 110½	 11.5/16
>>2	Shredder 6.02	 1½0½	 ****	 0100	 001½	 1111	  8.5/16
>>3	Shredder 6	 ½00½	 1011	 ****	 ½½½1	 0010	  7.5/16
>>4	Fritz 7	7,0,0,7  0000	 110½	 ½½½0	 ****	 1101	  7.0/16
>>5	Crafty 18.14	 001½	 0000	 1101	 0010	 ****	  5.5/16
>>
>>
>>>>game 1/1 Eatontown  2002 All engines 8 MB Hash Tables (Hiarcs 8 Upgraded book)
>>Crafty used Fritz 7 book, all others used their own opening book.
>>	                  1	  2	  3	  4	  5	  6
>>1	Fritz 7	7,0,0,8  ****	 1111	 1110	 0½1½	 1½11	 11½1	 16.0/20
>>2	Shredder 6	 0000	 ****	 110½	 ½½01	 1½11	 111½	 11.5/20
>>3	Hiarcs 8	 0001	 001½	 ****	 0011	 0111	 ½111	 11.0/20
>>4	Crafty 18.15	 1½0½	 ½½10	 1100	 ****	 1000	 ½1½½	  9.5/20
>>5	Shredder 6.02	 0½00	 0½00	 1000	 0111	 ****	 1110	  8.0/20
>>6	Crafty 18.14	 00½0	 000½	 ½000	 ½0½½	 0001	 ****	  4.0/20
>>
>> These are the results of a Pent II 350 MHz 384 sdram. Single computer engine
>>tournament with ponder off. Parameter box selected for each engine.
>>Compare Fritz 7 vs. Hiarcs 8 between both tournaments.
>>Shredder 6 was suprising compared to Shredder 6.02
>>I will definitely run this exact tournament again, and then once again with
>>Hiarcs again using it's CD opening book instead of the upgraded book. Hiarcs 8
>>seemed to perform better with the CD book version.
>>
>>
>>       Some intereting results with game 1 minute with 1 minute increments.
>>I would like to hear other results.
>>
>>Brian
Sorry that I was not clear enough on the time conrol.
The (game 1/1)given above each crosstable signifies a ONE minute time conrol
with one SECOND added per move. I mentioned this at the bottom of my Posting,
but I mistakenly typed 1 minute increments instead of 1 second time increments.
NOT ONE MINUTE ADDED INCREMENTS LIKE I MISTAKENLY TYPED.
VERY SORRY FOR THE ERROR. It's one minute and 1 second increments.
It would take a long time to run a tournament of this length (60 games)at 40/2.
I am assuming that is 40 moves in 2 hours or 40 minutes with either 2 second
time increments or 2 minute increments. I really do not have the time to run a
tournament like that right now.
Brian



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.