Author: Joseph Merolle
Date: 21:26:40 05/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
I am hoping that its integrety in long time controls 40 moves in two hours has not been compromised. To me real chess is not blitz. Does anyone have any new numbers when running test? regards Joseph On May 28, 2002 at 00:00:01, Brian Katz wrote: >On May 27, 2002 at 23:16:41, Joseph Merolle wrote: > >>You failed to mention time controls can you do one with 40 in 2 time controls >> >>regards Joseph >> >>On May 27, 2002 at 20:11:27, Brian Katz wrote: >> >>>game 1/1 Eatontown 2002 All engines 8 MB Hash Tables (Hiarcs 8 CD opening book) >>>Crafty used Fritz 7 book, all others used their own opening book. >>> 1 2 3 4 5 >>>1 Hiarcs 8 **** 0½1½ ½11½ 1111 110½ 11.5/16 >>>2 Shredder 6.02 1½0½ **** 0100 001½ 1111 8.5/16 >>>3 Shredder 6 ½00½ 1011 **** ½½½1 0010 7.5/16 >>>4 Fritz 7 7,0,0,7 0000 110½ ½½½0 **** 1101 7.0/16 >>>5 Crafty 18.14 001½ 0000 1101 0010 **** 5.5/16 >>> >>> >>>>>game 1/1 Eatontown 2002 All engines 8 MB Hash Tables (Hiarcs 8 Upgraded book) >>>Crafty used Fritz 7 book, all others used their own opening book. >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>>1 Fritz 7 7,0,0,8 **** 1111 1110 0½1½ 1½11 11½1 16.0/20 >>>2 Shredder 6 0000 **** 110½ ½½01 1½11 111½ 11.5/20 >>>3 Hiarcs 8 0001 001½ **** 0011 0111 ½111 11.0/20 >>>4 Crafty 18.15 1½0½ ½½10 1100 **** 1000 ½1½½ 9.5/20 >>>5 Shredder 6.02 0½00 0½00 1000 0111 **** 1110 8.0/20 >>>6 Crafty 18.14 00½0 000½ ½000 ½0½½ 0001 **** 4.0/20 >>> >>> These are the results of a Pent II 350 MHz 384 sdram. Single computer engine >>>tournament with ponder off. Parameter box selected for each engine. >>>Compare Fritz 7 vs. Hiarcs 8 between both tournaments. >>>Shredder 6 was suprising compared to Shredder 6.02 >>>I will definitely run this exact tournament again, and then once again with >>>Hiarcs again using it's CD opening book instead of the upgraded book. Hiarcs 8 >>>seemed to perform better with the CD book version. >>> >>> >>> Some intereting results with game 1 minute with 1 minute increments. >>>I would like to hear other results. >>> >>>Brian >Sorry that I was not clear enough on the time conrol. >The (game 1/1)given above each crosstable signifies a ONE minute time conrol >with one SECOND added per move. I mentioned this at the bottom of my Posting, >but I mistakenly typed 1 minute increments instead of 1 second time increments. >NOT ONE MINUTE ADDED INCREMENTS LIKE I MISTAKENLY TYPED. >VERY SORRY FOR THE ERROR. It's one minute and 1 second increments. >It would take a long time to run a tournament of this length (60 games)at 40/2. >I am assuming that is 40 moves in 2 hours or 40 minutes with either 2 second >time increments or 2 minute increments. I really do not have the time to run a >tournament like that right now. >Brian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.