Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:07:43 05/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2002 at 22:42:59, K. Burcham wrote: > > > > > [D] 8/4kp1Q/5p2/4p3/5n2/3r4/r7/4R2K b - - > > >Deep Shredder Paderborn >2x1533 amd mp > >...Rb2 33 seconds > > 7.01 0:00 +5.27 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Re4 (164.462) 339.0 > 8.01 0:02 +5.02-- 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Rxe5+ Kd6 4.Rd5+ Ke6 5.Re5+ Kd7 >6.Rd5+ Ke8 7.Re5+ Kd8 8.Rd5+ Ke8 9.Re5+ Kd8 10.Rd5+ Ke8 11.Re5+ (570.060) 255.0 > 8.01 0:02 +5.03 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Rxe5+ Kd6 4.Rb5 (572.229) 256.0 > 9.01 0:04 +5.02 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Rxe5+ Kd6 4.Rd5+ Kc7 5.Rd7+ Kb6 >6.Rb7+ Kc5 7.Rb4 (1.737.618) 364.5 > 10.01 0:09 +5.00 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Rxe5+ Kd6 4.Rd5+ Kc7 5.Rc5+ Kd8 >6.Rc3 Nf2+ 7.Kg1 Ne4 8.Rh3 f5 (4.489.498) 470.2 > 11.01 0:22 +4.75-- 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Rxe5+ Kd6 4.Rd5+ Kc7 5.Rc5+ Kb6 >6.Rb5+ Ka7 7.Rb4 f5 8.Rb1 f4 9.Rc1 (13.193.548) 575.9 > 11.01 0:23 +4.75 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 Nxh3 3.Rxe5+ Kd6 4.Rd5+ Kc7 5.Rc5+ Kb6 >6.Rb5+ Kc6 7.Rc5+ Kd7 8.Rd5+ Ke8 9.Re5+ Kd8 10.Rd5+ Ke8 11.Re5+ Kd8 12.Rd5+ Ke8 >13.Re5+ (13.261.407) 576.5 > 11.04 0:33 +4.76++ 1...Rb2 2.Qh6 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd6 5.Rd5+ Ke6 >6.Re5+ Kd7 7.Rd5+ Ke6 8.Re5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke6 10.Re5+ (20.710.222) 623.7 > 11.04 0:41 +5.00 1...Rb2 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd6 5.Rd5+ Ke6 >6.Re5+ Kd7 7.Rd5+ Ke6 8.Re5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke6 10.Re5+ (26.797.035) 646.6 > 12.01 1:21 +4.75-- 1...Rb2 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kf8 5.Re8+ Kg7 >6.Rg8+ Kh6 7.Rh8+ Kg7 8.Rxh3 Rb1+ (54.647.667) 671.1 > 12.01 1:22 +4.75 1...Rb2 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd8 5.Rd5+ Ke8 6.Rd3 >Nf2+ 7.Kh2 (55.247.861) 670.9 > 13.01 3:21 +4.74 1...Rb2 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd8 5.Rd5+ Ke8 >6.Re5+ Kd7 7.Rd5+ Ke6 8.Re5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke6 10.Re5+ Kd7 11.Rd5+ (138.575.981) >687.5 > 13.07 4:29 +4.75++ 1...Rb3 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd6 5.Rd5+ Kc7 >6.Rc5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc6 8.Rc5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke8 10.Re5+ Kd8 11.Rd5+ Ke8 12.Re5+ Kd8 >13.Rd5+ Ke8 14.Re5+ (188.198.434) 699.2 > 13.07 4:38 +4.75 1...Rb3 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd6 5.Rd5+ Kc7 >6.Rc5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc6 8.Rc5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke8 10.Re5+ Kd8 11.Rd5+ Ke8 12.Re5+ Kd8 >13.Rd5+ Ke8 14.Re5+ (195.056.756) 700.8 > 14.01 6:48 +4.75 1...Rb3 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd6 5.Rd5+ Kc7 >6.Rc5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc6 8.Rc5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke8 10.Re5+ Kd8 11.Rd5+ Ke8 12.Re5+ Kd8 >13.Rd5+ Ke8 14.Re5+ (288.058.569) 705.3 > 15.01 17:26 +4.75 1...Rb3 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 Nxh3 4.Rxe5+ Kd6 5.Rd5+ Kc7 >6.Rc5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc6 8.Rc5+ Kd7 9.Rd5+ Ke8 10.Re5+ Kd7 11.Rd5+ Ke8 12.Re5+ Kd7 >13.Rd5+ Ke8 (747.878.841) 714.8 >best move: Rd3-b3 time: 24:09.000 min n/s: 723.137 CPU 193.4% nodes: >1.047.826.260 TB: 178.167 > >kburcham The pv 1...Rb3 2.Qf5 Rh3+ 3.Qxh3 gives exactly the same position as after 1...Rh3+ 2.Qxh3 I have ideas how to solve the problem and maybe I am going to implement them in the future but I will need to check that I am not going to have problems in other positions and I do not hurry to add solutions that seem intuitively correct. Note that Kd6 disable the threat because after 1...Kd6 2.Qf5 Rh3+ Qxh3 Nxh3 Rd1+ Ke6 Rd6+ Kf5 Rxf6+ Ke4 white can resign but programs do not like to lose pawns so they do not like it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.