Author: Jorge
Date: 08:53:55 05/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2002 at 11:00:51, Sandi Ordinario wrote: >On May 28, 2002 at 09:45:17, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On May 28, 2002 at 09:19:30, Sandi Ordinario wrote: >> >>>Hi Mustafa et al, >>>Last week I wrote about CM on Pentium 3 beating Fritz on Pentium 4 whether >>>playing White or Black. I optimized Book options, reduced Hash to 2MB and turned >>>off all options except notation for Fritz. Both software was on 10 sec/move. If >>>I swapped them on the computers, CM8K run on Pentium 4 would beat Fritz on less >>>than 40 moves very brilliantly (sacrifices and all). I don't know what to do. I >>>hope it is not all hype for Fritz. >>> >>>Then I tried 20sec/move same settings but I raised Fritz's Hash to 4MB on the >>>Pentium 4 as white. It was able to draw for the first time CM8000 after 80 >>>moves. Perhaps Fritz is better with more thinking time, that is with higher Hash >>>setting. What do you think? I think you're trolling! >>>Sandi >> >>http://w1.859.telia.com/%7Eu85924109/ssdf/list.htm >> >>TM > >Hi TM >I looked at the results of the computer tournament and immediately I noticed >that the top dozen or so were running on AMD Athlon at 1.2GHz but CM and all the >rest of the runner-ups were on 450MHz. This is unfair. Why does not someone run >them at the same computer type and speed like I am doing? Perhaps they will get >a surprise of their life. >Sandi I agree! If this is the case, other variables should be the same or at least as close as the same as possible. regards, jorge
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.