Author: Sandi Ordinario
Date: 09:37:28 05/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2002 at 12:02:58, pavel wrote: > >> >>Hi TM >>I looked at the results of the computer tournament and immediately I noticed >>that the top dozen or so were running on AMD Athlon at 1.2GHz but CM and all the >>rest of the runner-ups were on 450MHz. This is unfair. Why does not someone run >>them at the same computer type and speed like I am doing? Perhaps they will get >>a surprise of their life. >>Sandi > > > > >10 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2652 23 -23 945 61% 2570 > >13 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2640 30 -29 592 66% 2521 >14 Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2631 45 -44 250 56% 2592 >14 Junior 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2631 27 -26 739 67% 2507 >16 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2630 28 -27 652 62% 2541 >16 Shredder 6.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2630 65 -62 124 57% 2578 >18 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 23 -22 1014 63% 2529 > >20 Shredder 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2606 31 -30 545 62% 2521 >21 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2588 18 -18 1483 58% 2533 >22 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2587 22 -22 1021 55% 2551 >23 Shredder 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2586 20 -20 1176 56% 2544 >24 Rebel Century 4.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2571 59 -61 138 44% 2612 >25 Shredder 4.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2568 23 -22 986 58% 2508 >26 Nimzo 8.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2554 24 -24 846 53% 2536 >27 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2553 24 -23 890 55% 2514 >28 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2551 21 -21 1070 54% 2520 >29 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2537 22 -22 996 52% 2520 >30 Gandalf 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2532 73 -68 102 60% 2458 >31 Gandalf 4.32f 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2531 28 -28 627 51% 2524 >32 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2527 21 -21 1131 47% 2546 >33 Hiarcs 7.01 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2521 30 -31 525 43% 2573 >34 SOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2520 19 -19 1307 47% 2539 >35 Gandalf 4.32h 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2518 36 -36 378 53% 2498 >36 Rebel Century 3.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2517 30 -30 546 49% 2523 >37 Chessmaster 8000 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2516 44 -45 251 45% 2549 >38 Goliath Light 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2507 24 -24 857 42% 2565 >39 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2490 23 -23 912 47% 2513 >40 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2485 22 -22 996 44% 2528 >41 MChess Pro 8.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2478 25 -26 753 40% 2549 >42 Genius 6.5 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2474 29 -29 565 48% 2487 >43 Crafty 18.12/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2472 35 -37 384 41% 2539 > > >the point is, at that level with that hardware, chessmaster is no where around >the best is deepfritz which is rated 2652 and chesmaster is rated 2516 > >thats more than a 100 elo differance, though you can argue that not enough games >where played, but how many did you play? > >I know CM8000 is good and all that, but it certainly is not at the same level as >far as strength is concerned (IMO). > >There is like 25 more engines above CM8000 in SSDF list. > >pavs Hi Pavel! I played about ten games as I have explained to Mustafa and only on one occasion did Fritz draw CM8000. I was running it on 1.5GHz Pentium 4 as White while CM8000 was black on a 0.9GHz Pentium 3. I hope someone could explain this better to me or at least have me specifically change parameters for Fritz6 so that it could win even if I run it on the Pentium 3 against other software except perhaps the newer versions. I see your logic but have you tried running the CM8000 on the 1.2GHz speed and compared it to both the winners and the runner-ups. What you say is just one side of the story. We should scientifically examine the whole range of computer speeds. Sandi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.