Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM8000 still better than Fritz 6 or 7 No And Never Was!

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 10:01:37 05/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 28, 2002 at 12:37:28, Sandi Ordinario wrote:

>On May 28, 2002 at 12:02:58, pavel wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>Hi TM
>>>I looked at the results of the computer tournament and immediately I noticed
>>>that the top dozen or so were running on AMD Athlon at 1.2GHz but CM and all the
>>>rest of the runner-ups were on 450MHz. This is unfair. Why does not someone run
>>>them at the same computer type and speed like I am doing? Perhaps they will get
>>>a surprise of their life.
>>>Sandi
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>10 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2652 23 -23 945 61% 2570
>>
>>13 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2640 30 -29 592 66% 2521
>>14 Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2631 45 -44 250 56% 2592
>>14 Junior 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2631 27 -26 739 67% 2507
>>16 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2630 28 -27 652 62% 2541
>>16 Shredder 6.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2630 65 -62 124 57% 2578
>>18 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2623 23 -22 1014 63% 2529
>>
>>20 Shredder 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2606 31 -30 545 62% 2521
>>21 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2588 18 -18 1483 58% 2533
>>22 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2587 22 -22 1021 55% 2551
>>23 Shredder 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2586 20 -20 1176 56% 2544
>>24 Rebel Century 4.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2571 59 -61 138 44% 2612
>>25 Shredder 4.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2568 23 -22 986 58% 2508
>>26 Nimzo 8.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2554 24 -24 846 53% 2536
>>27 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2553 24 -23 890 55% 2514
>>28 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2551 21 -21 1070 54% 2520
>>29 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2537 22 -22 996 52% 2520
>>30 Gandalf 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2532 73 -68 102 60% 2458
>>31 Gandalf 4.32f 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2531 28 -28 627 51% 2524
>>32 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2527 21 -21 1131 47% 2546
>>33 Hiarcs 7.01 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2521 30 -31 525 43% 2573
>>34 SOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2520 19 -19 1307 47% 2539
>>35 Gandalf 4.32h 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2518 36 -36 378 53% 2498
>>36 Rebel Century 3.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2517 30 -30 546 49% 2523
>>37 Chessmaster 8000 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2516 44 -45 251 45% 2549
>>38 Goliath Light 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2507 24 -24 857 42% 2565
>>39 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2490 23 -23 912 47% 2513
>>40 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2485 22 -22 996 44% 2528
>>41 MChess Pro 8.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2478 25 -26 753 40% 2549
>>42 Genius 6.5 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2474 29 -29 565 48% 2487
>>43 Crafty 18.12/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2472 35 -37 384 41% 2539
>>
>>
>>the point is, at that level with that hardware, chessmaster is no where around
>>the best is deepfritz which is rated 2652 and chesmaster is rated 2516
>>
>>thats more than a 100 elo differance, though you can argue that not enough games
>>where played, but how many did you play?
>>
>>I know CM8000 is good and all that, but it certainly is not at the same level as
>>far as strength is concerned (IMO).
>>
>>There is like 25 more engines above CM8000 in SSDF list.
>>
>>pavs
>
>Hi Pavel!
>I played about ten games as I have explained to Mustafa and only on one occasion
>did Fritz draw CM8000. I was running it on 1.5GHz Pentium 4 as White while
>CM8000 was black on a 0.9GHz Pentium 3. I hope someone could explain this better
>to me or at least have me specifically change parameters for Fritz6 so that it
>could win even if I run it on the Pentium 3 against other software except
>perhaps the newer versions.
>
>I see your logic but have you tried running the CM8000 on the 1.2GHz speed and
>compared it to both the winners and the runner-ups. What you say is just one
>side of the story. We should scientifically examine the whole range of computer
>speeds.
>Sandi

No, relative hardware will give relative results. Do you think CM8K magically
performs better on the a 1.2Ghz machine, relative to it's peers? There is only
a speed up of approx. 3x on the 1.2 Ghz. The ratings you see correspond
accordingly.

That's not "Scientific" and I don't know exactly what you're doing, but
regardless of that your sample size is also far to small.

Terry



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.