Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF should test Crafty 18.15 or should it?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:18:04 05/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 28, 2002 at 13:17:57, Albert Silver wrote:

>On May 27, 2002 at 14:02:47, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>
>I don't understand the purpose of changing the first move because of a loss.
>This implies that the first move was the cause of the loss, when it could easily
>(probably) been due to an error much later. If I play a wrong move in an Evans
>Gambit and lose because I didn't see far enough, does that mean the fault was
>1.e4?
>
>If the plan is to learn from previous moves, I would imagine that if a time
>control and the conditions (memory + CPU, etc.) is the same then it should play
>the same first move instantly, presuming that identical conditions will produce
>identical result, and then begin calculating again. The actual learning, to
>rpevent repetition, should logically appear just before the move where the
>evaluation dropped. Perhaps the program could be requested to begin studying the
>first two moves prior to the drop in greater depth. Example, if the eval dropped
>at move 6, then begin calculating at move 4 the same move, checking the log for
>the last depth achieved, and requesting the program go one ply deeper to see if
>it can detect the error. If no changes are found, then when it reaches the move
>prior to the eval drop, it will of course exclude the losing move though
>retaining the evaluation. Of course the request must respect the time control
>algorithms. Finally, the reason the first move alone should be played instantly,
>and not all the first moves before the perceived error, is that once it plays
>one move instantly, the time left changes, and this means that the next move may
>change now that it has more time to spend on its remaining moves.
>
>I should point out that I have no real knowledge of how learning is done
>nowadays, so it is essentially speculation.
>
>                                          Albert

The possible problem that I can imagine is that the program gets a position that
it does not understand and the real error is not 2 or 4 plies before the eval
drop but 10 plies before the eval drop.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.