Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:55:56 05/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2002 at 15:04:48, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On May 28, 2002 at 11:51:09, Jeroen Noomen wrote:
>
>>On May 28, 2002 at 05:55:17, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>>
>>Not only inferior hardware, but against Pharaon Tiger lost on time
>>in a winning position, score +6.
>>
>>Jeroen
>
>well to quote Christophe: "a 300Mhz PII can beat crafty at a quad".
>
>So a single cpu K7 shouldn't be a problem to handle with a 500Mhz PII :)
Actually all the opponents of Tiger in Massy were running on K7, and they were
running on processors 2 to 4 times faster than the processor used by Tiger.
The list of opponents:
BBChess, Athlon 1700+ (Tiger won)
Anmon, Athlon 1600+ (Tiger won)
Chess Wizard, Athlon 2000+ (Tiger won)
El Chinito, Athlon 1800+ (draw)
Pharaon, Athlon 1200+ (Tiger lost on time in a won position, score +6.12)
ET Chess, Athlon 1000 (draw)
So I consider Tiger running on PII-504 to be undefeated in Massy 2002.
I hope nobody will take offense of this. I think Frank Zibi (Pharaon) is fair
enough to recognize that it is not Tiger but the operator who has been beaten in
that game.
Christophe
>note that a PII is 20% slower than PIII for C programs (not for fritz).
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Note that Tiger had to run on inferior hardware (although better than a Palm -:)
>>>).
>>>
>>>Uli
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.