Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:28:04 05/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2002 at 09:06:53, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On May 28, 2002 at 16:36:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >The time control was game in 30. With 111 moves being played, there >was simply no more time left. > >Jeroen It seems that there was more time left but only for the opponent. The question is if the operator of tiger was slower or if tiger wasted more time for it's moves. I think that is a bad idea to play games with no increasment between computers when the games are not played automatically by winboard or something similiar. A time control of 10 minutes per game+ 10 second per move can prevent losing on time and a game of 120 moves is not going to take more than an hour. It is possible to adjudicate games after 120 moves based on evaluation of one of the programs that do not participate in order to avoid the trouble of possible very long games if the participants do not want to play for more than one hour. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.