Author: Mark Young
Date: 07:14:09 07/29/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 1998 at 04:16:08, blass uri wrote: >I began to do a nunn match with 30 minutes per game+30 seconds per move >and Fritz5 has better results than with 10 minutes per game+10 seconds per >move(in that match after 10 games the result was 7.5:2.5 for Junior5 and now the >result is 5.5:4.5 for fritz5). >I gave both programs 59968 Kbytes hash tables >in the 30 minutes+30 seconds match when I gave both programs almost 12000 Kbytes >hash tables in the 10 minutes+10 seconds match. >. > >Fritz5 has a weakness in seeing the position > >It is the reason it lost to stobor in the World micro computer championship. >It traded queens and only after it did it it saw stobor's position is better and >it is not a question of time(even if I give fritz5 30 minutes it will do the >same mistake). > >Something like this cannot happen to Junior. >This is the reason I expected Junior to earn more from time than fritz >but it did not happen. > >Uri I have found the same thing with fritz 5. When people say it plays weak moves I have to wonder if they were playing it at 5 sec. a move. I found that fritz 5 gains rapidly in strength as it has more time. Much more so then other programs. Except for maybe CM 5500 or 5000.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.