Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 09:23:04 05/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2002 at 09:28:04, Uri Blass wrote: I think those questions are pretty pointless. All in all the tournament is over and the result stands. The 'what if', 'maybe I should' and 'it was a bad idea to' questions cannot change anything to the result. One thing remains: To prevent such things to happen again, there should be another time control, or Tiger should have more time allocated to operating the moves. Jeroen >It seems that there was more time left but only for the opponent. > >The question is if the operator of tiger was slower or if tiger wasted more time >for it's moves. > >I think that is a bad idea to play games with no increasment between computers >when the games are not played automatically by winboard or something similiar. > >A time control of 10 minutes per game+ 10 second per move can prevent losing on >time and a game of 120 moves is not going to take more than an hour. > >It is possible to adjudicate games after 120 moves based on evaluation of one of >the programs that do not participate in order to avoid >the trouble of possible very long games if the participants do not want to play >for more than one hour. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.