Author: pavel
Date: 19:19:48 05/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
> >It seems to me that black can win. > >I think that one of the ideas of black is to push the white king to the corner >or to passive position when white cannot defend the pawn b4 and after the pawn >b4 falls black can win the game later by capturing h2(black may need to >sacrifice the rook for bishop and pawn. > >Another idea is simply to try to capture h2 when white cannot prevent it because >white has to defend from mate. > >I do not what exactly is possible here and I need more analysis to be sure but >based on expereience of seeing similiar positions I smell a win for black. > >Uri You are right :) [D]8/4K3/1r6/3k4/1P3B2/7p/7P/8 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 8: 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 2kN, tb=11 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 2kN, tb=11 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 2kN, tb=11 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 -+ (-2.41) Depth: 8/16 00:00:00 10kN, tb=15 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Rg4 60.Bb8 Rb4 -+ (-2.35) Depth: 9/18 00:00:00 41kN, tb=90 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Rg4 60.Bb8 Ke4 61.Bc7 Rg2 -+ (-2.43) Depth: 10/19 00:00:00 121kN, tb=271 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Rg4 60.Bb8 Ke4 61.Bc7 Rg2 -+ (-2.43) Depth: 11/21 00:00:01 275kN, tb=1033 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Rg4 60.Bb8 Ke4 61.Bc7 Rg2 -+ (-2.43) Depth: 12/23 00:00:04 598kN, tb=1848 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Rg4 60.Bb8 Ke4 61.Bc7 Rg2 -+ (-2.43) Depth: 13/24 00:00:10 1343kN, tb=4344 58.Bg3 Rxb4 -+ (-2.68) Depth: 14/26 00:00:28 3191kN, tb=16971 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Ke4 60.Kg5 Kf3 61.Bc7 Rb1 62.Kf5 Rh1 63.Be5 Kg2 64.Kg4 Rxh2 -+ (-3.70) Depth: 14/30 00:00:50 5625kN, tb=26800 58.Bg3 Rxb4 -+ (-3.97) Depth: 15/30 00:01:19 9752kN, tb=43763 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Ke4 60.Kg5 Kf3 61.Kf5 Rb1 -+ (-4.56) Depth: 15/30 00:02:27 17637kN, tb=64492 58.Bg3 Rxb4 -+ (-4.81) Depth: 16/30 00:03:54 25845kN, tb=86739 58.Bg3 Rxb4 59.Kf6 Ke4 60.Bc7 Kf3 61.Ke6 Kg2 62.Kd5 Kg1 63.Ke6 Rb2 64.Kf5 -+ (-#34) Depth: 16/30 00:03:59 26299kN, tb=88829 58.Bc1 Rxb4 59.Bh6 Rb7+ 60.Ke8 Rb1 61.Bg5 Rb3 62.Bh4 Rf3 63.Ke7 Rf4 64.Bg3 Rb4 -+ (-#40) Depth: 16/30 00:04:35 29985kN, tb=109145 (Mahamood, home 30.05.2002) by the way I think I know why at some positions (during the game) fritz7 (and other chessbase engines) dont use full cpu, only 2-3% and the rest of the processor is idle, it probably because of the hash size. Because when I checked the "task Manager" I see that the program is swaping alot and using more memory then I specified, but this is in very rare position, during the game in one or two positions. I only used 128mb has but sometimes Fritz used way more than that amount(300-350), and i dont know why. I have 512mb ram. It might be some kind of bug, memory leaking of some short. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.