Author: Ron Langeveld
Date: 15:27:58 05/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2002 at 06:50:56, stuart taylor wrote: >For me, the experiment is over. Hiarcs does not look especially great at higher >time controls. Even if it would win a match like this (although it is looking a >bit doubtful) it is clear that it does not excell at this time allowance. > Maybe at an hour per move it would, but the indications for that are also >nothing special, as this is not showing any movement in that direction either. > >So, in spite of the one or two brilliances which Hiarcs 8.0 might be capable >of, as written about in Uniaks article, I don't know if I want to buy it for >that alone. >S.Taylor Too bad you are only looking at "statistics" from 5 (?) games instead of using your own knowledge of chess in order to evaluate what Hiarcs' strongpoints are. Imho it is not the tournament book, because that really sucks, so for starters it should have been replaced.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.