Author: pavel
Date: 15:41:41 05/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2002 at 18:27:58, Ron Langeveld wrote: >On May 31, 2002 at 06:50:56, stuart taylor wrote: > >>For me, the experiment is over. Hiarcs does not look especially great at higher >>time controls. Even if it would win a match like this (although it is looking a >>bit doubtful) it is clear that it does not excell at this time allowance. >> Maybe at an hour per move it would, but the indications for that are also >>nothing special, as this is not showing any movement in that direction either. >> >>So, in spite of the one or two brilliances which Hiarcs 8.0 might be capable >>of, as written about in Uniaks article, I don't know if I want to buy it for >>that alone. >>S.Taylor > >Too bad you are only looking at "statistics" from 5 (?) games instead of using >your own knowledge of chess in order to evaluate what Hiarcs' strongpoints are. >Imho it is not the tournament book, because that really sucks, so for starters >it should have been replaced. According to the hiarcs8 team the tournament book is the best choice, so I dont see any reason not to believe them.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.