Author: pavel
Date: 16:31:33 05/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2002 at 19:20:00, John Merlino wrote: >On May 31, 2002 at 18:52:51, pavel wrote: > >>Fritz 7 - Hiarcs 8 >>[D]3Q4/1p6/3kp3/P2b4/8/7r/4K3/8 b - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Hiarcs 8: >> >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 >> ³ (-0.68) Depth: 1 00:00:00 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 >> ³ (-0.68) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 >> ³ (-0.68) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Kd2 Rb3 47.Qc7+ Kd4 >> ³ (-0.57) Depth: 4/13 00:00:00 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Kd2 Rb3 47.Qc7+ Kd4 >> ³ (-0.57) Depth: 5/15 00:00:00 2kN >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Kd2 Rb3 47.Qc7+ Kb5 48.Kd1 >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 6/16 00:00:00 9kN >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Kd2 Rd3+ 47.Kc2 Rc3+ >> ³ (-0.56) Depth: 7/18 00:00:00 21kN, tb=1 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Kb5 48.Qb6+ Kc4 49.Qd6 >> ³ (-0.62) Depth: 8/21 00:00:00 60kN, tb=16 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Rb3 48.Ke2 Ka4 49.Kd2 Rh3 >> ³ (-0.65) Depth: 9/24 00:00:01 196kN, tb=61 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Rb3 48.Qb6+ Ka4 49.Qa7 Rh3 50.Qb6 Rb3 >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 10/27 00:00:02 544kN, tb=291 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Rb3 48.Qb6+ Ka4 49.Qa7 Rh3 50.Qb6 Rh4 >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 11/28 00:00:07 1362kN, tb=892 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Rb3 48.Qb6+ Ka4 49.Qa7 Kb4 >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 12/30 00:00:13 2474kN, tb=1718 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Rb3 48.Qb6+ Ka4 49.Qa7 >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 13/32 00:01:01 8740kN, tb=5470 >>44...Kc5 45.Qb6+ Kc4 46.Qc7+ Kb4 47.Kd2 Rb3 48.Qb6+ Ka4 49.Qa7 Kb5 50.Qb6+ Kc4 >>51.Qc7+ Kd4 52.Qg7+ >> ³ (-0.65) Depth: 14/35 00:02:55 23619kN, tb=15762 >> >>(Mahamood, home 31.05.2002) >> >>Apparently Fritz7 thinks that white has a slight advantage, though I dont see >>how. IMO yet another interesting endgame. > >Chessmaster 9000, on a PIII-733, says draw: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -0.04 1969 1...Kc5 2.Qc7+ Kb4 3.Kd2 Bc6 >0:00 2/4 0.00 3786 1...Kc5 2.Qc7+ Kd4 3.Qf4+ Be4 4.Qd6+ > Bd5 5.Qf4+ >0:00 3/5 0.00 12597 1...Kc5 2.Qc7+ Kd4 3.Qf4+ Be4 4.Qd6+ > Bd5 5.Qf4+ >0:00 4/6 -0.03 60720 1...Kc5 2.Qc7+ Kb4 3.Kd2 Bc4 4.Qxb7+ > Kxa5 5.Qa7+ Kb4 6.Qd4 >0:01 5/7 0.00 154703 1...Kc5 2.Qc7+ Kb4 3.Qb6+ Kc3 4.Qc7+ > Kd4 5.Qf4+ Be4 6.Qd6+ Bd5 7.Qf4+ >0:10 6/8 0.00 915152 1...Kc5 2.Kd2 Rf3 3.Qb6+ Kc4 4.Qc7+ > Kd4 5.Qb6+ Ke5 6.Qb2+ Ke4 7.Qb4+ > Ke5 8.Qb2+ >0:39 7/9 -0.05 3430291 1...Kc5 2.Qb6+ Kc4 3.a6 bxa6 4.Qxa6+ > Kc5 5.Qa7+ Kd6 6.Qb8+ Kd7 7.Qa7+ > Kc6 8.Qa6+ Kc7 9.Qa7+ Kd8 10.Qb8+ > Ke7 11.Qf4 >1:37 8/10 -0.05 8446542 1...Kc5 2.Qb6+ Kc4 3.a6 bxa6 4.Qxa6+ > Kb4 5.Qb6+ Kc3 6.Qa5+ Kc2 7.Qc5+ > Rc3 8.Qd4 Bc4+ 9.Ke1 Kb3 10.Qb6+ > Ka4 11.Qd4 >4:41 9/11 -0.01 24669071 1...Kc5 2.Qb6+ Kc4 3.a6 bxa6 4.Qxa6+ > Kb4 5.Qb6+ Kc3 6.Qa5+ Kd4 7.Qd2+ > Kc4 8.Qf4+ Kb3 9.Kd2 Bc4 10.Qb8+ > Ka4 11.Qe5 >14:56 10/12 -0.01 79378089 1...Kc5 2.Qb6+ Kc4 3.a6 bxa6 4.Qxa6+ > Kb4 5.Qb6+ Kc3 6.Qa5+ Kd4 7.Qd2+ > Kc4 8.Qf4+ Kb3 9.Kd2 Bc4 10.Qd6 > Ka4 11.Qe5 > >jm Yes CM is right, this does look like a draw, stupid me ;) pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.