Author: Tina Long
Date: 17:22:09 06/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2002 at 15:59:08, stuart taylor wrote: >On June 01, 2002 at 12:00:04, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 01, 2002 at 10:46:37, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On June 01, 2002 at 02:17:21, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>On June 01, 2002 at 01:56:14, Joseph Merolle wrote: >>>> >>>>>Fritz 5.32 on a 200mhz 64 mb of ram scored even on the last ssdf with shredder >>>>>on an A1200 256 ram. 3.5 - 3.5. >>>>---------- >>>>This just goes to prove that anything can happen with only a small sample of >>>>games which has been proven many times here! >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> Terry >>> >>>The real question is "Why did they stop after 7 games?". I played Fritz 5.32 vs >>>Shredder 6 at G/30 minutes and Fritz 5.32 killed Shredder 6 (78.5-35.5). Makes >>>you wonder what is going on. >>>Jim >> >>I do not know. >> >>Maybe there is some book line that helped Fritz to get positions that shredder >>does not understand so Fritz could beat shredder again and again at that time >>control. >> >>Looking at the games can reveal information. >> >>Uri > >If so, that is a very fishy situation. >Either you cancel those games, or you continue as it is, and what happens >happens. If you want to do neither of those, then those seven games shouldn't be >kept either. > THAT is what is really corrupt. >This is quite serious if this was the case! >S.Taylor Uri is referring to James's 78.5-35.5, not the SSDF 3.5-3.5. Even if he was talking SSDF there is certainly nothing "fishy" or "corrupt" about Fritz beating Shredder due to advantageous booklines. >>>"Why did they stop after 7 games?" I think they didn't stop, and by the time of the release of the next list that match of 40 games will be completed. Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.