Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending?

Author: Terry Ripple

Date: 01:47:21 06/02/02

Could Fritz,Century,Tiger,Junior,or Crafty solve any or all the 5 piece endgame
problems if given no time limit and not able to use Nalimov's tablebases?

If the answer is no, then why not if the program could take any amount of time
that it needed to find the correct answer to the solution?

Thanks in advance for any information!

Best Regards,
Terry

• Re: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending? Guido 12:43:33 06/02/02
• Re: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending? Robert Hyatt 07:50:52 06/02/02
  • Re: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending? Mike Byrne 21:12:34 06/02/02
  • Re: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending? Jesper Antonsson 08:43:49 06/02/02
    • Re: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending? Robert Hyatt 16:43:39 06/02/02
    • Re: If you gave a program unlimited time, could it solve a 5 piece ending? David Dory 12:33:08 06/02/02
  • Re: Thanks Bob (NT) Terry Ripple 08:11:22 06/02/02
• No, because of null move Rémi Coulom 02:02:36 06/02/02
  • Re: No, because of null move James T. Walker 05:53:45 06/02/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Rémi Coulom 07:49:06 06/02/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Pham Minh Tri 06:40:02 06/02/02
      • Re: No, because of null move Christophe Theron 09:26:53 06/02/02
        • Re: No, because of null move Pham Minh Tri 06:16:11 06/03/02
          • Re: No, because of null move Christophe Theron 12:21:08 06/03/02
          • Re: No, because of null move Christophe Theron 12:16:41 06/03/02
      • Re: No, because of null move James T. Walker 07:10:34 06/02/02
  • Re: No, because of null move Uri Blass 02:37:27 06/02/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Russell Reagan 20:51:30 06/02/02
      • Re: No, because of null move Uri Blass 21:26:35 06/02/02
        • Re: No, because of null move Ricardo Gibert 18:39:19 06/03/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Rémi Coulom 07:46:34 06/02/02
  • Re: Thanks Remi ,( NT) Terry Ripple 02:05:44 06/02/02
• Yes GuyHaworth 01:51:33 06/02/02
  • Re: Yes ( Then by this reasoning it could do 6 man and even higher! Terry Ripple 02:02:19 06/02/02
    • Yes - Zermelo's result GuyHaworth 10:32:46 06/02/02
      • Re: Yes - Zermelo's result Telmo Escobar 12:16:12 06/02/02
        • Re: Yes - Zermelo's result GuyHaworth 22:40:39 06/02/02
      • Re: Yes - Zermelo's result Gian-Carlo Pascutto 10:36:51 06/02/02
        • Re: Yes - Zermelo's result Russell Reagan 20:59:16 06/02/02
    • Re: Yes ( Then by this reasoning it could do 6 man and even higher! Daniel Clausen 04:23:52 06/02/02
      • Re: Yes ( Then by this reasoning it could do 6 man and even higher! Pham Minh Tri 06:19:53 06/02/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.